Content Policy

NEXUM ANALYTICS LTD, a company registered in England and Wales (company number 17440513), registered office 66 Paul Street, London, EC2A 4NA, United Kingdom ("Nexum", "the house").

Content Policy v2 · 18 September 2026

Effective date: 20 October 2026 · Last updated: 20 October 2026

1. Scope

This policy governs what appears on the Platform: register entries and the examinations published on them, founder updates to an entry, and Faculty questions and answers on the record. It applies to founders, to seat-holders, and to anyone who reads a public entry. The Terms of Service govern accounts and the service itself; the Privacy Policy governs personal data; the Confidentiality page governs who may read what. This policy governs what may be published and how the house handles notices about it.

2. Operator and law

The Platform is operated by NEXUM ANALYTICS LTD, a company registered in England and Wales (company number 17440513), registered office 66 Paul Street, London, EC2A 4NA, United Kingdom. This policy, and every content decision made under it, is governed by the law of England and Wales.

3. What may be published

A register entry is published only with the founder's consent, in the mode the founder elected — named or blind. Blind entries are served from a field allowlist that excludes identity.

An entry may carry:

• the record as filed, in the fields the founder chose to show;
• the examination the house produced: findings, keystone analysis, summaries, and the signed report;
• the founder's own updates to the entry;
• Faculty questions and answers on the record.

Every published examination carries its reference and its signatures. The analyst's findings are published as written; the house does not edit a delivered report to change its meaning.

4. What is not permitted

The following may not be filed, published, or posted anywhere on the Platform:

• content that breaks the law of England and Wales, or the law that applies to the person posting it;
• content that infringes copyright, trademark, or any other right;
• content that sexualises minors — removed on sight and reported where the law requires;
• content that promotes terrorism or incites violence;
• fraudulent filings, impersonation of a person or organisation, and manufactured testimonials or social proof;
• the publication of private information without consent, threats, and targeted harassment;
• malware, phishing links, and content designed to disrupt the Platform;
• register content reproduced outside the Platform — the seat-holder's undertaking in Part B of the Confidentiality page governs this, and founders may enforce it directly.

Content that is lawful but breaches a term of this policy or the Terms of Service is handled the same way: under section 6.

5. Faculty questions and answers

A seat-holder may ask questions on the record; the founder may answer. Questions and answers are content on the entry and are held to this policy like everything else on it. They are commentary on the record: findings are the analysts', a second reviewer signs the report before delivery, and Fellows do not sign verdicts. A question or answer that breaches section 4 is removed under section 6, and the seat-holder's undertaking on the Confidentiality page continues to apply to everything read through the seat.

6. Takedown

To notify the house about content — a breach of this policy, a copyright claim, a privacy matter, or an inquiry from a regulatory authority — write to [email protected] and mark the subject with the kind of notice.

Include who you are and how to reach you, where the content is (URL or reference), what rule or right it breaches, and why. A copyright notice should also identify the work claimed to be infringed, state a good-faith belief that the use is unauthorised, and state under penalty of perjury that the notice is accurate and that you are the rights holder or act for them.

The house acknowledges every notice within two working days. Review follows, and the outcome is one of: the content stands, the content is removed or restricted, the account is suspended or closed, or the matter is referred to authorities where the law requires it. The affected person is told what was decided and why, and may appeal by replying to that decision within 30 days; an appeal is read by someone uninvolved in the original decision. A person whose content was removed on a copyright claim may send a counter-notice to the same address with their signature, the location of the removed content, a statement under penalty of perjury that the removal was a mistake or misidentification, their contact details, and consent to the jurisdiction of the courts of their residence.

Notices sent in bad faith — to harass a founder or to suppress lawful content — are themselves a breach of this policy.

7. Obligations under the Digital Services Act

The house serves users in the European Union, so the Digital Services Act applies to its operations.

7.1 Single point of contact. The house maintains a single point of contact for authorities and users on DSA matters: [email protected].

7.2 EU legal representative. As a service provider established outside the European Union — in England and Wales — the house is required to designate a legal representative in an EU Member State. The house commits to designating this representative within 90 days of platform launch and will name them on this page.

7.3 Terms of service clarity. The Terms of Service are written in plain language alongside the necessary legal precision, and state the restrictions the house applies to content, accounts, and the service.

7.4 Notice-and-action mechanism. The takedown process in section 6 is the mechanism by which any person or entity may notify the house of potentially illegal content.

7.5 Reasoned decisions. Where the house restricts, suspends, or removes content or an account for illegal content or a breach of its terms, the affected person receives a clear statement of what was restricted, the reasons, the factual and legal grounds where applicable, and the ways to contest the decision.

7.6 Internal complaint handling. A person who disagrees with a moderation decision may appeal through the process in section 6.

7.7 Transparency reporting. The house publishes an annual transparency report covering orders received from Member State authorities, notices received and acted on, moderation on the house's own initiative, and complaints received and their handling. The first report is published within 12 months of launch.

7.8 Cooperation with authorities. The house cooperates with Digital Services Coordinators, Member State competent authorities, and the European Commission on matters within their jurisdiction, under the law of England and Wales and the lawful demands of the jurisdictions where it has users.

8. Version

Content Policy v2 · 18 September 2026. This version replaces version 1 in full. Changes to this policy are published on this page, and the version line above moves with them.

Contact

NEXUM ANALYTICS LTD · 66 Paul Street, London, EC2A 4NA, United Kingdom · [email protected]